Members
Nineteen people participated in this study. These were most of the recruited inside the Hong kong, speaking Cantonese because their first vocabulary, and college or university-educated (often upcoming-newest college students otherwise recently graduated). Them plus talked English and you can Mandarin because 2nd dialects. Their mean top was 159.cuatro cm (SD ± cuatro.4). Participation is actually volunteer without you to definitely gotten one monetary remuneration. No body claimed people (reputation of) message and you will reading disability.
Warm-Right up Activity
This research composed around three jobs: warm-upwards, facial appeal get, and you may message production task. The work have been completed in an equivalent training in the a peaceful place towards college campus. Players have been recorded having fun with a Logitech H340 microphone in the a sample rates from 49.step 1 kHz.
In the warm-upwards concept, professionals was requested to state the fresh new semantically natural utterance ???,?????? “Good morning. What exactly is your own major?” 3 x without having to be shown one graphic stimuli. The purpose of this step was to familiarize the players which have chief production activity, that will be explained lower than.
Facial Attractiveness Rating
Fifty various other men face stimuli were used. We only integrated confronts regarding Eastern Far eastern ethnicities because their possess be a little more familiar to our players (cf. Coetzee et al., 2014). 40 of the confronts was in fact relatively glamorous Far eastern male confronts (celebs and you will otherwise). The remainder stimulus was relatively faster glamorous men faces (again along with celebs). The pictures from men a-listers was in fact people away from Hong-kong, Korea, The japanese, and Mainland China. The stimuli were in public places readily available photos taken from the web.
Professionals was basically questioned so you can rates the fresh new attractiveness of this type of 50 face to the a 1 ? 10 size (ten = most attractive) and jot down their effect for the a response sheet. These people were told to ft the reviews strictly about much they certainly were attracted to per face, and to disregard any prior knowledge of this new respective men otherwise feel they could keeps with individuals out of comparable styles. Stimulus was indeed displayed during the a great randomized acquisition within the Microsoft Powerpoint glides.
Creation Activity
In accordance with the critiques from more than, for every participant the 5 extremely attractive and you can four the very least attractive confronts were used just like the target stimuli for the a consequent design task. In the event of faces with the same get, those people that had been showed afterwards have been selected. For every deal with was demonstrated 3 x into separate times within the haphazard acquisition. Players was indeed coached to assume by themselves inside the a class form, and that a man deal with are regarding a great classmate sitting second in it. Members have been up coming to ask a man classmate ???,?????? “Good morning. What exactly is the significant?” Of each new member, 30 utterances was submitted. Tracks have been then analyzed playing with ProsodyPro (Xu, 2013 ver. 5.seven.2), which enables guidelines examining of singing pulses and you may automatically components several acoustic specifications, due to the fact will be presented less than.
Article hoc Questionnaire
Preliminary data analysis revealed a bimodal distribution which was seemingly related to participants’ height. Specifically, we seemed to observe that taller participants seemed to behave in the opposite direction from the rest. To verify this, we sent out a questionnaire to gather information on participants’ height and how satisfied they were about it. There were four questions in the questionnaire: (1) “How tall are you?,” (2) “On a scale of 1 to 10, how satisfied are you about your own height?,” (3) “If you are not satisfied, how much taller/shorter would you like to be (in centimeters)?,” and (4) “What are you doing to address your unsatisfactory height 
(e.g., wearing high heels)?” All participants bar one responded (i.e., N = 18). Based on their response, participants were then classified in terms of how satisfied they were about their height, namely (H)ighly satisfied, (M)oderately satisfied, and (L)east satisfied. There were six participants in each category. The correlation between participants’ height and their satisfaction with their own height was nearly but not significant, rs = 0.446, N = 18, p = 0.063.
